3 ms·
As I wrote, it is not required YET. >>~First a convenience, then a requirement. It is starting at this stage as a convenient option [0][1]. The stage to be c
by toss1 5y ago
As I wrote, it is not required YET.
>>~First a convenience, then a requirement.
It is starting at this stage as a convenient option [0][1]. The stage to be concerned about is when it becomes ubiquitious, then default, then mandatory. Might not be soon, but it is a large round rock rolling downhill. Might be stoppable, but that's usually the default progression.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_driver%27s_license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_driver%27s_license
[1] https://www.cnet.com/news/your-future-drivers-license-could-go-digital/ https://www.cnet.com/news/your-future-drivers-license-could-...
- vanusa 5y agoYour language said "they require [that you run] apps" -- in the present, not future tense.
- toss1 5y agoOkay, but that was speaking in the abstract context, and you're right, I was assuming the future tense and not unambiguously forcing it there in that line. That said, another part of it was clearly in the future tense. >>At that point, we'll need two devices. So, thanks for the alert, I'll try to be more clear next time.
- vanusa 5y agoAll good, thanks for clarifying. My main concern was the assertions made in the comment I initially responded to, several layers up. Whose author seems to have ghosted us, since making them.