3 ms·
I'm the one who originally asked for a source - there was no name calling, nor should there be. If someone is going to make a bold claim about something genera
by tharne 5y ago
I'm the one who originally asked for a source - there was no name calling, nor should there be.
If someone is going to make a bold claim about something generally considered to be safe, actually causing a significant number of injuries, it's irresponsible not to provide a source.
- hatware 5y agoThe name-calling wasn't referring to you. I'm pretty clearly referring to the person who threw out "conspiracy theory thinking" as if that was helping anything. For what it's worth: Sometimes there isn't a source. It will behoove you to entertain an idea without demanding that someone provide a source that you approve of. You can check VAERS yourself. Asking for sources on something that is so publicly available is... weird.