Last line of the article is that law firms have already lined up to defend the law pro bono. I suspect this is 2 parts political grandstanding and 1 part test

Last line of the article is that law firms have already lined up to defend the law pro bono. I suspect this is 2 parts political grandstanding and 1 part test case, but it'll be interesting to see it play out in the courts. The low dollar amount and revenue collected is probably intentional, so that the lawyers can argue that it doesn't pose an undue burden on gun owners and get the case law precedent opening up the door to bigger taxes later.