3 ms·
Though it appears they may reverse this, I think it’s worth discussion that a googler commented the following within 90mins after issue 1263679 creation: “Yep,
by nofunsir 5y ago
Though it appears they may reverse this, I think it’s worth discussion that a googler commented the following within 90mins after issue 1263679 creation:
“Yep, I think Tommy, Angela, and I all came to the same conclusion that we'd like the pre-populated search engines list to be indestructible, or maybe even immutable. A front-end UI restriction sounds like a step in the right direction.”
Also of interest, it seems the one who reported the bug with “strong preference” is the one who implemented the change.
- user3939382 5y agoThey’ll be immutably non-existent because I won’t use the browser in that case, I pretty much don’t already due to Google’s ethical bankruptcy. Notice how almost none of these updates gives the user more control over their computer, network utilization, or browser. I’m still regularly trying to help Chrome users in my life understand the difference between being signed into Chrome and signed into Google.