Firstly, I was addressing the claim in the comment I replied to that it's not open source. It's licenced under MIT That's not what the licence states at all...

Firstly, I was addressing the claim in the comment I replied to that it's not open source. It's licenced under MIT That's not what the licence states at all... > Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person ... including without limitation the rights to use .. copies of the Software. The licence states Permission is granted free of charge to use the software, if the software is charging then that's a breach of the licence..?