4 ms·
Freedoms aren’t considered in isolation. Maintaining freedom for some means removing freedom for others some times. In this case the “freedom” to get timely tre
by yibg 5y ago
Freedoms aren’t considered in isolation. Maintaining freedom for some means removing freedom for others some times. In this case the “freedom” to get timely treatment for those that need it.
- jokethrowaway 5y ago> In this case the “freedom” to get timely treatment for those that need it. That's not freedom, that's an entitlement.
- spookthesunset 5y ago> In this case the “freedom” to get timely treatment for those that need it So why not build more capacity instead of forcing the public to adhere to a bunch of toxic and socially corrosive mandates?
- ipaddr 5y agoAre you not getting timely treatment? Is this your reality?
- xdennis 5y ago> the “freedom” to get timely treatment for those that need it. That's not freedom. Freedom is not putting up barriers.
- yibg 5y agoInteresting. In this take, what are the limits to freedom? Your right to swing your fist and all that. If your actions are limiting what I can do, is that not curtailing my freedoms? Edit: to be clear on where I stand. I think you can do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't affect me. If it affects me, maybe you should still be able to do it, but then we need some thought and discussion and isn't an automatic right because "freedom".