4 ms·
He's a former FDA commissioner, so his opinion is arguably relevant. I'm not sure why they called him "Pfizer board member." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scot
by rory 5y ago
He's a former FDA commissioner, so his opinion is arguably relevant. I'm not sure why they called him "Pfizer board member."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Gottlieb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Gottlieb
- guilhas 5y ago"One hand washes the other"
- xdennis 5y agoIs it because he's a board member? I remember a time when people thought it worrying when regulators moved to highly paid positions of the companies they were in charge of regulating.
- rory 5y agoI mean the description is correct, just not the most relevant identifier. If Ronald Blaylock (investment banker and another board member) made a statement like this, I doubt anyone would care. But yeah, having our required health treatments controlled by a group of Goldman Sachs et al executives and former regulators collecting large payouts from a company they previously regulated isn't ideal.