18 ms·

It shouldn't be clearer - the plugin author should require an affirmative response from the developer that they accept those terms.

• joshstrange 5y ago
  > It shouldn't be clearer - the plugin author should require an affirmative response from the developer that they accept those terms. Ehh, I disagree. We all know developers would click through any terms without reading anyway and the onerous is on us to read the license before we integrate 3rd party code, which we rarely do. I see this as /just deserts/, a sort of hat tip and "well played sir". The 30% that is not mentioned is the sticking point, the 2% is absolutely reasonable and I might even say I'd think 30% is reasonable IF it had been called out in the license.
• kapp_in_life 5y ago
  The affirmative response is downloading and using the plugin.
  • nextaccountic 5y ago
    The only thing plugin users agreed to was the LICENSE, which is actually MIT! https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/floatinghotpot/cordova-admob-pro/blob/mas...
• nemothekid 5y ago
  >the plugin author should require an affirmative response from the developer that they accept those terms. It's free software provided without warranty. It's right there in the MIT license.