3 ms·
> If someone is balking at spending $200/mo on the lowest level, they are simply not a customer. >> Ultimately, we want to accomplish two things: >> It should
by ignoramous 5y ago
> If someone is balking at spending $200/mo on the lowest level, they are simply not a customer.
>> Ultimately, we want to accomplish two things:
>> It should scale well, from small mostly text based web apps to large, intense apps that handle a lot of data. You should be able to build a CDN on Fly.io without worrying too much about your bandwidth costs. You should also be able to run a hobby project for close to free.
>> Transparency and predictability are good. People should be able to glance at pricing, do minimal mental math, and judge how well it works for their app.
from: https://fly.io/blog/we-cut-bandwidth-prices-go-nuts/ https://fly.io/blog/we-cut-bandwidth-prices-go-nuts/
Btw, technology adoption begins at the "lowest level", if Geoffery Moore and Clayton Christensen are to be believed: https://archive.is/42NS6#selection-586.0-586.1 https://archive.is/42NS6#selection-586.0-586.1
- notyourday 5y agoEric Schmidt disagrees. You might have heard about the company that adopted that as the approach. It is called Google.
- tptacek 5y agoOh, thanks for clearing that up. I thought you might have been talking about Novell.
- notyourday 5y agoNovell was trying not to be the expensive kid on the block. We know how well it worked out for them.