3 ms·
This is a procedural decision. The Court did not conclude that Intel didn't do anything anti-competitive, just that the Commission didn't do a proper analysis.
by yorwba 5y ago
This is a procedural decision. The Court did not conclude that Intel didn't do anything anti-competitive, just that the Commission didn't do a proper analysis.
Now they'll have to redo it following the correct procedure, which will most likely result in Intel getting fined again.
- jevoten 5y agoI attempted to read it, but wasn't able to figure out what analysis exactly was missing or faulty. But I did give up at around page 3. On the face of it, the case couldn't be simpler: Intel had >50% of the market, and paid to exclude AMD. If this case is taking over a decade to resolve (time during which the bad actor can further entrench themselves), then EU anti-trust law is practically useless.