10 ms·
It’s getting really bad. Having a date, or at least an accurate date on an article is a liability towards google traffic. Even old articles about things that ha
by wodenokoto 5y ago
It’s getting really bad. Having a date, or at least an accurate date on an article is a liability towards google traffic. Even old articles about things that happened a long time will be “updated” every 6 month in order to have a relevant date on them.
- dusted 5y agoyes, and that's absolutely insane from a search perspective.. Google used to be an effective tool for searching for content online, but it's turning into a personal assistant type of tool where the interface is search queries. But it's a retarded assistant that has no idea (and seems to be unable to get one) about what you're doing. I'd much rather have a very good and "dumb" search tool, one where I can make complicated queries to filter out what I want, than one that is "smart" 60% of the time, and entirely useless if the first 2 results it guessed were not right.