> The problem is that unless you observe the behaviour yourself as it happens, with substantial context, the idea that you can reliably know whether the behavio

> The problem is that unless you observe the behaviour yourself as it happens, with substantial context, the idea that you can reliably know whether the behaviour was unacceptable is fundamentally flawed. Yes but we're not trying to be perfect, we have to live and deal with this grey area. > Point being being that humans even with context and in the position to interrogate the people involved can't solve this with any kind of reliability. I disagree here, I think we can quite reliably do this a great amount of the time. There are absolutely bad actors who will get away with things in the short term but because context builds up over time it never lasts. And once you are aware they're trying to be subversive its much easier to spot earlier. It's not an attack with legs. > Then the notion that an AI at current state of the art without access to context or the ability to interrogate those involved doesn't stand a chance. I absolutely agree here. And I'm sorry the people in charge were rubbish at protecting you from bullying.