Guest, not "kook". Why use the term "kook" when all that happened - and hopefully will continue to happen - is that Rogan allowed criticism of the regime by cre

Guest, not "kook". Why use the term "kook" when all that happened - and hopefully will continue to happen - is that Rogan allowed criticism of the regime by credible sources to be aired. The sources are credible because they have built a reputation on their knowledge in their fields of expertise. As to whether their criticism of the regime is valid is up to the listener to decide, not up to the censor or any (ironically-named) "fact checker". It is certainly not up to media talking heads who just parrot whatever they get fed by the regime and would gladly tell you your country has always been at war with Eurasia.