3 ms·

Slightly related: I may want to contribute to the cause by building a very small personal site on a broadband connection (unfiltered public dynamic IP plus Duck

Slightly related: I may want to contribute to the cause by building a very small personal site on a broadband connection (unfiltered public dynamic IP plus DuckDns) after I solve some health problems and relocate, hopefully within a few months. If I'm lucky I should get a better connection than the roughly 60down/22up I have now, which would seem ridiculous for that use, but I'd make a strictly static site, no Javascript, small images and no or extremely small downloads (torrent might help for bigger ones, if any). I don't plan to build any community around it, just to document projects I would discuss on newsgroups and possibly here, so no user input would be involved. Anyone here who had a similar experience can share more information, caveats, suggest tools, etc? Thanks.

mrlemke 5y ago
Apache with server side includes (SSI) will allow you to quickly and easily template websites without adding new tools or processes. I find this to be a decent balance between a static site and DRY. I don't care for most static site generators since I prefer to write my site content in HTML as much as possible. For example, your index.html may look like:  <h1>My Website</h1> <p>A bunch of content</p>  top.html could be something like: <html> <head> <title>My Website</title>  </head> <body> And for bottom.html: <footer>  </footer> </body> </html>
BenjiWiebe 5y ago
Are you saying 22Mbps upload is ridiculous for hosting a website? I may be parsing your comment wrong... Anyways if it's a static site with little JS and not too many smallish images, that'll be plenty of bandwidth for a personal site. If a page load is 1MB (that's a lot for this sort of website!) that'll let you serve up to ~2.75 requests per second/86.4k requests per day which is a lot of traffic! And if the burst is double that, then your page load will merely take twice as long.

mrlemke 5y ago

Apache with server side includes (SSI) will allow you to quickly and easily template websites without adding new tools or processes. I find this to be a decent balance between a static site and DRY. I don't care for most static site generators since I prefer to write my site content in HTML as much as possible. For example, your index.html may look like:  <h1>My Website</h1> <p>A bunch of content</p>  top.html could be something like: <html> <head> <title>My Website</title>  </head> <body> And for bottom.html: <footer>  </footer> </body> </html>

BenjiWiebe 5y ago

Are you saying 22Mbps upload is ridiculous for hosting a website? I may be parsing your comment wrong... Anyways if it's a static site with little JS and not too many smallish images, that'll be plenty of bandwidth for a personal site. If a page load is 1MB (that's a lot for this sort of website!) that'll let you serve up to ~2.75 requests per second/86.4k requests per day which is a lot of traffic! And if the burst is double that, then your page load will merely take twice as long.