3 ms·
TLDR version goes something like this "There is hardware support for low latency networks, thus the OS community should make use of it." Overall the paper is w
by roxtar 15y ago
TLDR version goes something like this "There is hardware support for low latency networks, thus the OS community should make use of it."
Overall the paper is weak. It contains arguments without experiments. Section 5 (which I think is the main section) claims a lot of things without presenting data, experiments and evaluation.
- xtacy 15y ago> It contains arguments without experiments. Unfortunately, that's due to the nature of the conference. HotOS/Nets/etc. Such conferences encourage such papers to stir up some discussion. If you're interested in knowing more about what they're doing, you can check the website where they document everything: http://fiz.stanford.edu:8081/display/ramcloud/Home http://fiz.stanford.edu:8081/display/ramcloud/Home.
- rxin 15y agoThe nature of HotOS is to encourage visionary ideas. They have an SOSP paper: http://www.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/papers/ramcloud-recovery.pdf http://www.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/papers/ramcloud-reco...