so your argument against consortiums (bluetooth) is that they work?… but at a higher cost (lengthy specs)? the historic alternative is a slightly lower cost (m

so your argument against consortiums (bluetooth) is that they work?… but at a higher cost (lengthy specs)? the historic alternative is a slightly lower cost (most of BT complexity is of the plumbing type, not the PhD type) and much more significant market risks (due to incompatibilities: smaller addressable market and less ability to pivot from one market to a different one). from the engineer PoV, i agree with you: i’d love for these specifications to be simplified. from the business PoV, i don’t think it actually matters that much.