3 ms·
> nowhere near "iPhone prices" for Pinephones iPhone SE is $399. PinePhone Pro is $399. Samsung is averaging ~$250. > ...for almost certainly tiny numbers of
by zrm 5y ago
> nowhere near "iPhone prices" for Pinephones
iPhone SE is $399. PinePhone Pro is $399. Samsung is averaging ~$250.
> ...for almost certainly tiny numbers of sales in both cases
They're doing preorders and are regularly sold out and backordered, despite having high prices and old hardware and weird bugs. That is what high demand looks like.
Meanwhile no change to the hardware is required and Samsung could carry on selling to everyone they currently do, plus all of those people.
This whole comments section is full of people complaining about this. If you give them a choice between two otherwise fungible phones, one that has open source drivers etc. and can therefore run an up to date vanilla kernel indefinitely, why wouldn't they all choose that one?
- post-it 5y ago> They're doing preorders and are regularly sold out and backordered, despite having high prices and old hardware and weird bugs. That is what high demand looks like. The custom Linux phone I make is also sold out! I've made zero units and there are zero available. That is what high demand looks like.
- zrm 5y agoIs it sarcasm because you can't point to anyone who isn't selling out? There is clearly more demand than there is supply. This is the weirdest position to stake out. That nobody wants this because everybody who makes one has a line of customers around the block and mainstream media outlets are writing stories about how much people want this, which go to the front page of tech news aggregators because of all the people who feel the same way. What evidence of demand are you looking for? A larger production run which is also commercially successful? You can't expect that as a precondition for doing one.