3 ms·
Hmm... I think our standards for application functionality are also a lot higher. For example, how many applications from the 90s dealt flawlessly with unicode
by nicoburns 5y ago
Hmm... I think our standards for application functionality are also a lot higher. For example, how many applications from the 90s dealt flawlessly with unicode text.
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y agoHow much added slowness do you think Unicode is responsible for? Because as much of a complex nightmarish standard as it is[0], there are plenty of applications that are fast that handle it just fine as far as I can tell. They're built with native widgets and written in (probably) C. [0] plenty of slow as fuck modern software doesn't handle it even close to 'flawlessly'