That is very concerning. I'd still follow Hanlon's Razor: Never Attribute to Malice That Which is Adequately Explained by Stupidity. The Mayo Clinic has less ex

That is very concerning. I'd still follow Hanlon's Razor: Never Attribute to Malice That Which is Adequately Explained by Stupidity. The Mayo Clinic has less excuse but the health care folks not entering your MIL's data I can definitely semi-understand based on what the emergency rooms looked like at that time. Still not acceptable to not get it right after you repeatedly reminded them though! I kind of disagree that "Any answer will only undermine that goal" because giving both the bad news of side effects with the good news of the efficacy of the vaccine strengthens trust in science and the people doing this research. But I see your point because the average person WILL probably say "I'll take my chances with covid because I (or my kids) will be fine" vs. 1 .001% chance of heart damage. I appreciate the dialog about this and thanks for giving your story.