3 ms·
It does happen quite often, especially when groups (n>1) are involved in decision making and the parties don't all agree on the causes or have divergent views o
by vivegi 5y ago
It does happen quite often, especially when groups (n>1) are involved in decision making and the parties don't all agree on the causes or have divergent views or have competing vested interests. eg: UN decision making or Climate change action planning etc.,
When this occurs, they dig in firmly in their positions and either argue for keeping the fence as-is (maintain status quo) or taking it down (action bias).
- winstonewert 5y agoExcept that's a totally different scenario, where the different parties have different interests and thus don't agree on whether to keep the fence, not one where we don't know why the fence exists.