> They aren't right, but I can understand the perspective. How? I'm curious. If someone makes accusations that you know to be false, wouldn't your best defense

> They aren't right, but I can understand the perspective. How? I'm curious. If someone makes accusations that you know to be false, wouldn't your best defense be a comprehensive refutation? What alternative do you see that would be more compelling? I, for one, really appreciate this level of detail, because the most common alternative is to attack back mercilessly without evidence. This tactic being commonly employed by politicians the world over.