4 ms·
If all data can't be handed over to the users, why are they relying on fallible humans to do the filtering? They should be itching to automate it, and have had
by jsnell 5y ago
If all data can't be handed over to the users, why are they relying on fallible humans to do the filtering? They should be itching to automate it, and have had half a decade to accomplish it by now.
Note that "bound by corporate secrets" is not a legit reason to not hand over or data. There are legit reasons for not handing data over, but just the interests of the company are not it. It sounds like you've been working with bad actors who are not only refusing to invest in regulatory compliance, but are wilfully using bad processes to mask their non-compliance. Why are you making excuses for them?
- svennek 5y agoRecital 63 of the GDPR disagrees with you "That right should not adversely affect the rights or freedoms of others, including trade secrets or intellectual property and in particular the copyright protecting the software." Btw. I am not a laywer, but I have worked with this stuff for half a decade..
- svennek 5y agoAlso, none of my ccustomers refuse it. This specific customer spends around two days of worktime (including legal) on every request. They are unfortunately for them bound by a lot of regulation (and governmental oversight) that normal companies are not and the take the GDPR extremely serious.