2 ms·
I've heard a hypothesis saying that JS endures because it's bad, otherwise it would've been subsumed by other languages and we never would've been fed up with i
by cercatrova 5y ago
I've heard a hypothesis saying that JS endures because it's bad, otherwise it would've been subsumed by other languages and we never would've been fed up with it to create Webassembly, which is more optimized for its use case than what the other languages we might've used instead of JS.
In other words, feeling the pain of JS over 20 years led to the creation of WASM that might not have been as needed had we had good languages on the web present.
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pBYqen3B2gc https://youtube.com/watch?v=pBYqen3B2gc
- andrekandre 5y ago> In other words, feeling the pain of JS over 20 years led to the creation of WASM that might not have been as needed had we had good languages on the web present. honestly, that sounds like retroactive justification... bytecodes where a thing since way before js showed up, and afaik there was no technical reason it couldn't have been like that from the beginning