7 ms·

The linked document is a legal brief from Ascension, not a finding by a judge, and represents Ascension's view of the situation. That said, the judge apparentl

• himinlomax 5y ago
  Note that you can probably give the benefit of the doubt to Ascension here on the factual claims simply because they (or their lawyer) could get in trouble with the court for lying, while they have little to gain in this case by doing so. The most damning elements, such as Thedacare having revoked the former employees' accounts, not scheduling them and having refused to renegotiate the employment terms would be so easy to disprove that it's hard to see how they could be entirely made up.
• Natsu 5y ago
  You're not wrong, but the details on how they could hire outside contractors to save their certification and the details on how this won't harm actual patients--the only conceivable grounds for the temporary injunction as far as I'm concerned--coupled with the judge dismissing the injunction are things I find very persuasive. Some of the details in there can also be cross-checked with other things, like that posting on r/nursing. So you present a very good point that we can't take anyone's reply as gospel truth, but in this case, we do have significant corroboration for the points made in this. The points I can actually verify are more than enough for me to say that ThedaCare is full of crap and deserves to go out of business. I know that I won't be patronizing them, given any reasonable choice in the matter.