3 ms·
The question is whether the two are somehow indistinguishable (to 80% of people, at least). IV bleach would also have pretty serious effects, but likely no one
by dpark 5y ago
The question is whether the two are somehow indistinguishable (to 80% of people, at least).
IV bleach would also have pretty serious effects, but likely no one would confuse it for cocaine.
The onus is on inter_netuser to provide evidence for the claim, not for pennaMann to refute it. I would imagine that literally no study exists comparing the effects of intravenous caffeine and cocaine, because who would possibly fund that study, and to what end, and what review board would approve it?
- capableweb 5y agoHere is one similar study (I don't think is the right one though): > Intravenous nicotine and caffeine: subjective and physiological effects in cocaine abusers > The subjective and physiological effects of intravenously administered caffeine and nicotine were compared in nine subjects with histories of using caffeine, tobacco, and cocaine. > https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11160635/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11160635/ Since this study exists, why is it so far off the other study exists? I don't know why it got funded, or to what end, but I'm sure happy it did. We need to study drugs more, not less.
- inter_netuser 5y agoNora Volkow, the director of NIDA, an agency of NIH working on drugs and addiction, has like a 100 papers on cocaine. Idk why people are so surprised. Even iv DMT has been funded and officially researched some time around 90s