3 ms·
There's one more thing I need to ask you: Now, since the end of the Cold War, Russia has lost quite a lot of territory. This territory has all been snapped up
by vanusa 5y ago
There's one more thing I need to ask you:
Now, since the end of the Cold War, Russia has lost quite a lot of territory. This territory has all been snapped up by NATO, even though the Cold War was apparently over.
Which "Russian territory" are you referring to as being "snapped up by NATO"? It would have to be the Baltics (and perhaps Poland), right? As "Russian" territory?
Please do clarify.
- uejfiweun 5y agoI encourage you to use Google if you want to investigate my claims, and decide for yourself. Seems like your mind is already made up though.
- seanw444 5y agoApparently people don't know about the former Soviet satellite states?
- vanusa 5y agoWe all know the history. It's the implication that these are somehow naturally "Russian" territories (and that the world just needs to step back and accept this fact) that I find kind of -- strange.
- vanusa 5y agoThat's about the kind of (non-) answer I was expecting, actually.
- uejfiweun 5y agoNo, I want to get the last word in! If you're implying that I'm some Russian internet troll, then all I can say is lol.
- vanusa 5y agoNothing of the sort. But your responses do seem to be consistently evasive, for whatever reason. If you think the Baltics somehow "belong" to Russia, or that Russia would be justified in taking "action" to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO (which is definitely what you were implying in your posts) -- then just come out and say it.