I have underlying concerns about forks in that it can be easy to fork and then hard to maintain - primarily because the level of knowledge required to fork a pr

I have underlying concerns about forks in that it can be easy to fork and then hard to maintain - primarily because the level of knowledge required to fork a project is (or can be) much lower than that required to actually improve it, or fix it, or evolve it. - What have they changed to keep fees lower? Is it just a factor of fewer users (Ethereum's gas fees are a result of the adoption of Ethereum, essentially it's a victim of its own success) - Is it remaining proof of work? Will it also eventually need to transition to PoS if and when it reaches Ethereum-level popularity / congestion? - Is it implementing sharding? - How will it compete with Ethereum's fairly significant decentralisation? (one of the aspects of Ethereum that makes it an unlikely target of the SEC) Fundamentally, how intimately do Pulsechain's developers understand Ethereum in order to make a better version? (I've heard the 'scam' and Hex used together frequently, although admittedly that's on Reddit and Youtube, and in the cryptocurrency-sphere pretty much every project gets used together frequently with the word 'scam' - to such an extent that "assume scam" is probably sage advice).