3 ms·
I’ll save everyone some time: the article doesn’t contain any stats, nor mentions of how the survey was done or which scientific disciplines were undervalued. I
by 908B64B197 5y ago
I’ll save everyone some time: the article doesn’t contain any stats, nor mentions of how the survey was done or which scientific disciplines were undervalued. It also doesn’t link to any peer-reviewed article where the author could have filled those gaps. It however links to articles from reputable scientific journals such as Business insiders or the New York Times and myths such as the "wage gap".
It’s ironic considering the article is whining about some scientific disciplines being considered less rigorous, yet makes no attempt to be rigorous itself.
- tasogare 5y agoThe only linked paper is from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, so basically soft science whining about hard science with "muh men bad" argument. So typical divisive BS gender study. I'll continue to work with coworkers from both sexes without taking offense in a disparity that isn't even proved to have influence on papers' quality and science output.
- 1shooner 5y agoIt's a research brief, and it links to the DOI. You can find the actual paper: https://psyarxiv.com/xyast/download?format=pdf https://psyarxiv.com/xyast/download?format=pdf