3 ms·
In this case, that is correct. From my (and the project TOS;DR's [0]) interpretation the TOS is still in general worded in such a way that Google can ultimately
by Qub3d 5y ago
In this case, that is correct. From my (and the project TOS;DR's [0]) interpretation the TOS is still in general worded in such a way that Google can ultimately say, "we feel this shouldn't be here" and remove it.
For the record, that is fine, legally speaking. It just is something that I think we don't keep in mind, until our Gmail login gets locked[1] and our last backup was 6+ months ago.
[0]:https://tosdr.org/en/service/217 https://tosdr.org/en/service/217
[1]:https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=google%20locked&sort=byPopularity&type=story https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...