3 ms·

>Weird how the West progressed but many cultures hadn't even invented the wheel by the time of colonialism. It's hard not to economically progress when one rob

>Weird how the West progressed but many cultures hadn't even invented the wheel by the time of colonialism. It's hard not to economically progress when one robs and sabotages all the largest economies in the world. Using deception and fraud in a time where honorable men were revered is an edge, I agree. You are pointing out rituals in the rest of the world but those were occassional ceremonies. In Europe, eating humans was "just lunch" or "just a meat pie", not a once in a year religious event. Same for European human blood drinking, which was very popular as medicine and a thirst quencher for more than 1000 years. >basically non existent in western culture after the 15th century Wrong, European medicine was primitive at best until the mid 19th century, colonisation is how Europeans gathered most of the valid medical knowledge from the world (indegenous herb and plant medicine knoweledge plays an outsized role in what we consider modern pharma). Europeans also ate most of the mummies in existence. Are you claiming Europeans ate all of the mummies they did eat before the 15th century? Before the major European excavations in Egypt occurred? Nonsense, the trade started much later and continued well into the 1900s. This is historical fact. --- "Mummy was still sold as medicine in a German medical catalog at the beginning of the 20th century. And in 1908, a last known attempt was made in Germany to swallow blood at the scaffold. "Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires: The History of Corpse Medicine from the Renaissance to the Victorians, reveal that for several hundred years, peaking in the 16th and 17th centuries, many Europeans, including royalty, priests and scientists, routinely ingested remedies containing human bones, blood and fat as medicine for everything from headaches to epilepsy" “...the poor, who couldn’t always afford the processed compounds sold in apothecaries, could gain the benefits of cannibal medicine by standing by at executions, paying a small amount for a cup of the still-warm blood of the condemned.The executioner was considered a big healer in Germanic countries,” says Sugg. “He was a social leper with almost magical powers.” For those who preferred their blood cooked, a 1679 recipe from a Franciscan apothecary describes how to make it into marmalade." https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-gruesome-history-of-eating-corpses-as-medicine-82360284/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-gruesome-history-... I repeat... >The savages arent who you think they are.

defaultprimate 5y ago
>It's hard not to economically progress when one robs and sabotages all the largest economies in the world. You mean what literally every society and culture was doing for all of human history? Native tribes across the globe were in perpetual war. Why do you think it was called the Aztec Empire as just one example? Every primitive culture would have done the same thing if they had the technology. Deception is a recurring theme in The Art of War and similar strategic works across time. Ancient Greece, ancient Rome, China, Persia, Islamic empires, etc. >You are pointing out rituals in the rest of the world but these were occassional ceremonies. lol no they weren't, human sacrifice happened dozens of times a day every day in Mayan and Aztec civilization. Cannibalism was a regular staple in many native American and African tribes. All your comments on cannibalism are complete bullshit. The mummy eating stuff was basically over by the 17th century, except in rare instances. Eating mummies is also completely different from literally killing someone for the purpose of eating them, or decapitating/ripping the heart out of someone for human sacrifice. For someone claiming objective facts you certainly don't have any. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_cannibalism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_canniba...
- ashwagary 5y ago
  >basically non existent in western culture after the 15th century >basically over by the 17th century It went from 15th century to 17th century? I like that you are admitting you dont know basic European history and based on your factually deficient response, you still have a lot to catch up on. I will leave you to do that.
  - defaultprimate 5y ago
    No it didn't, you'll notice I had very precise descriptors in each comment. I'm glad you accept that your perspective that Western colonials were uniquely bad is blatantly false.
    - ashwagary 5y ago
      >Eating mummies is also completely different from literally killing someone for the purpose of eating them... Europeans did both. Everything I stated is factual and didnt require alteration or retraction. You on the other hand, have been proven wrong over and over again and that anecdata from a wikipedia page as a source is laughable. Re-read the thread and quotes, perhaps you missed the part where you lost this argument. We need to argue using facts and citations, not feelings. You, for one, being off by 2-3 centuries is not trivial in a discussion of recent history.

defaultprimate 5y ago

>It's hard not to economically progress when one robs and sabotages all the largest economies in the world. You mean what literally every society and culture was doing for all of human history? Native tribes across the globe were in perpetual war. Why do you think it was called the Aztec Empire as just one example? Every primitive culture would have done the same thing if they had the technology. Deception is a recurring theme in The Art of War and similar strategic works across time. Ancient Greece, ancient Rome, China, Persia, Islamic empires, etc. >You are pointing out rituals in the rest of the world but these were occassional ceremonies. lol no they weren't, human sacrifice happened dozens of times a day every day in Mayan and Aztec civilization. Cannibalism was a regular staple in many native American and African tribes. All your comments on cannibalism are complete bullshit. The mummy eating stuff was basically over by the 17th century, except in rare instances. Eating mummies is also completely different from literally killing someone for the purpose of eating them, or decapitating/ripping the heart out of someone for human sacrifice. For someone claiming objective facts you certainly don't have any. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_cannibalism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_canniba...

ashwagary 5y ago
>basically non existent in western culture after the 15th century >basically over by the 17th century It went from 15th century to 17th century? I like that you are admitting you dont know basic European history and based on your factually deficient response, you still have a lot to catch up on. I will leave you to do that.
- defaultprimate 5y ago
  No it didn't, you'll notice I had very precise descriptors in each comment. I'm glad you accept that your perspective that Western colonials were uniquely bad is blatantly false.
  - ashwagary 5y ago
    >Eating mummies is also completely different from literally killing someone for the purpose of eating them... Europeans did both. Everything I stated is factual and didnt require alteration or retraction. You on the other hand, have been proven wrong over and over again and that anecdata from a wikipedia page as a source is laughable. Re-read the thread and quotes, perhaps you missed the part where you lost this argument. We need to argue using facts and citations, not feelings. You, for one, being off by 2-3 centuries is not trivial in a discussion of recent history.