3 ms·
>You seem to assume SELinux is the end-all be all of Linux security. Never said or implied anything of the sort. >I recognize, based on your other comment, th
by YATA0 5y ago
>You seem to assume SELinux is the end-all be all of Linux security.
Never said or implied anything of the sort.
>I recognize, based on your other comment, that you are fairly new to the field(a whole decade, go you!).
I've been implementing secure, hardened UNIX and Linux probably longer than you've been alive. I just specifically worked on DoD TS+ systems for a decade.
The rest of your Gish gallop is nonsense. Linux also has capability based security ON TOP of all the other aspects of security, SELinux included.
>If you want to have a reasoned discussion about security
That's not possible with you. You instantly showed how little you know about security in general when you flouted your lack of SELinux knowledge, then you proceeded to Gish gallop and sealion because you've been called out.
Stop it.
- zie 5y agoIf this is how you interact with people in the real world, I feel sorry for them. Grow up and interact with humanity better.
- YATA0 5y ago>If this is how you interact with people in the real world, I feel sorry for them. IMAX-levle projection. The only one here you should feel sorry for is yourself. > Grow up and interact with humanity better. "no u". Grow up and take the L with grace.
- skeptical1 5y agoMaybe he's just tired of people who offer ignorant opinions and argue based on conjecture and not actual knowledge.
- YATA0 5y agoDING DING DING DING DING
- ybloviator 5y agoAnd they say BSD users have attitude issues, lol.
- YATA0 5y agoI also use BSD, AIX, Solaris, etc. As someone stated below, maybe I'm "just tired of people who offer ignorant opinions and argue based on conjecture and not actual knowledge."