3 ms·
seems fair to me. you are still getting paid. > it just seems like a disincentive to have children people who get paid in stock aren't warehouse employees the
by dominotw 5y ago
seems fair to me. you are still getting paid.
> it just seems like a disincentive to have children
people who get paid in stock aren't warehouse employees they are highly paid software engineer types, surely they can tolerate getting by on 200k/yr salary for a few months.
this is a huge over reaction.
- manuelabeledo 5y ago> people who get paid in stock aren't warehouse employees they are highly paid software engineer types, surely they can tolerate getting by on 200k/yr salary for a few months. Why would anyone be OK with not getting paid their fair, and agreed, share? I don't understand why anyone would side with a trillion dollar corporation, instead of a worker, regardless of how much he or she makes.
- dominotw 5y ago> Why would anyone be OK with not getting paid their fair, and agreed, share? Agreed? Surely their employment contract included this clause, wouldn't that be plainly illegal to do that otherwise? > I don't understand why anyone would side with a trillion dollar corporation, instead of a worker, Because not everyone chooses which side they are on first and comes up with the justification later.
- Rebelgecko 5y agoDoes Amazon do employment contracts? From what I've seen they're relatively rare at tech companies, except for executives.