4 ms·

The message from governments and public health officials have morphed constantly over the past 2 years. I know that dynamic situations require a dynamic respons

The message from governments and public health officials have morphed constantly over the past 2 years. I know that dynamic situations require a dynamic response and I also know that people are demanding certainty from officials in an uncertain situation so I don’t really blame anyone. But with that said and since you asked: - March 2020: Flatten the curve, stay-home orders until we can get enough PPE to medical staff. Don’t worry about masks doctors need them and y’all wear them wrong probably. - April 2020: Keep hunkering down as we get contact tracing and those contract tracing apps - May 2020: Lol jk masks work you should all wear masks. Once there is a vaccine we can go back to normal. - Summer 2020: lots of hedging, students are probably doing fine with remote. Kids like social media anyway so they will be alright Fall 2020: The curve was flat all summer but not flat enough and now it’s going up again. Lockdown! Winter 21: Vaccines are here! Ticket to normality! Spring 21: seriously we promise the vaccines are so good, cdc even said so. Mask off. Here comes herd immunity Summer 21: actually jk. Vaccines are good but delta! Mask on, Future. Fall 21: Omicron time! Back to fear, and maybe a booster? We will see the CDC can’t decide. Winter 21: Oh yeah, should have gotten that booster. Also the cloth masks don’t really work, gotta wear N95! But it’s fine, this variant will make the disease endemic Now: Endemic doesn’t mean safe dude, get your mask on, live in fear. We might need to close schools again. Oh you are right, nothing has changed really between today and two years ago, except for all the things they said between those two points!

fivea 5y ago
> The message from governments and public health officials have morphed constantly over the past 2 years (...) It really hasn't, and it boggles the mind how anyone could even attempt to gaslight about this well-documented topic. The only charitable interpretation I have of this blatantly unrealistic assertion is whether, for some reason, people intentionally ignore the correlation between how waves start and how they motivate decisive but politically risky moves to reign them back in, the increase in vaccine uptake and it's impact on hospital admittances and death rate, and the impact of new strains. Also, it boggles the mind how anyone can try to spin scientific progresses, such as the quantification of the impact of adopting makeshift solutions of cloth masks, as somehow things changing. I mean, is it really surprising that cloth masks aren't as efficient as N95 masks? Where exactly comes this blatant attempt to gaslight everyone around topics that are so easy to corroborate ad verify?
- PraetorianGourd 5y ago
  There is absolutely no gas-lighting, which please do not misuse the term[1]. Two people can have very different lived experiences within the same time period and expressing those earnestly is not gaslighting. Which, judging by your use of the term “jab” I’m going to assume you are British or Irish, in which case we’ve certainly had different experiences as I’m a west-coast American. My argument around N-95 versus cloth was that it was clear from day 1 to any reasonable person that N-95 offers better protection than cloth masks. We had two years of business and school closures, several stimulus packages etc. and it wasn’t until literally last week that the government put forward a plan to distribute N-95 masks at pharmacies at no cost. That should have been standard operating procedure from day 1, but not. Culture was too focused on the performative act of masking over actually using effectual masks. And you mention “how waves start” and how that motivates how decisive action is taken. It was clear over a year ago that this virus was incredibly seasonal, with outbreaks aligning with when “inside time” happens (winter in the North of the USA, Summer in the South). It was clear over a year ago that this virus is entirely spread via aerosols, and is very unlikely to spread outside. Yet we were closing beaches and chastising unmasked people outside. And while we should all wash our hands, doing so doesn’t really impact an aerosolized respiratory virus. So if public health experts have been so prudently adjusting advice based on constantly evolving data, why were we all so married to the NPIs that we decided on in March 2020? It seems everyone picked their “side” then and refused to cede an inch to the other “side”, which is abhorrent behavior all around. Of course vaccines have reduced death and hospitalization. As of right now, 74% of adult Americans are fully vaccinated. That means 74% of adults have very strong protection against severe illness. 88% of 65+ adults are protected via two doses. A year ago this would have been considered a miracle. On top of that we have an antiviral that reduces severe disease risk greatly even and especially among high risk. Any of these miracles, (vaccines, treatments) on 2020 would have been enough to avoid lockdowns (and maybe even masks) but now in 2022, we get the constant drumbeat of “well it’s not _quite_ safe enough yet”. That is why I say the goal posts have moved. Almost anyone in the USA who wants protection can get it _for free_ and we still aren’t living life anywhere near “normally”. That is absurd. [1] https://www.wellandgood.com/misuse-gaslighting/amp/ https://www.wellandgood.com/misuse-gaslighting/amp/
- bad_username 5y ago

fivea 5y ago

> The message from governments and public health officials have morphed constantly over the past 2 years (...) It really hasn't, and it boggles the mind how anyone could even attempt to gaslight about this well-documented topic. The only charitable interpretation I have of this blatantly unrealistic assertion is whether, for some reason, people intentionally ignore the correlation between how waves start and how they motivate decisive but politically risky moves to reign them back in, the increase in vaccine uptake and it's impact on hospital admittances and death rate, and the impact of new strains. Also, it boggles the mind how anyone can try to spin scientific progresses, such as the quantification of the impact of adopting makeshift solutions of cloth masks, as somehow things changing. I mean, is it really surprising that cloth masks aren't as efficient as N95 masks? Where exactly comes this blatant attempt to gaslight everyone around topics that are so easy to corroborate ad verify?

PraetorianGourd 5y ago
There is absolutely no gas-lighting, which please do not misuse the term[1]. Two people can have very different lived experiences within the same time period and expressing those earnestly is not gaslighting. Which, judging by your use of the term “jab” I’m going to assume you are British or Irish, in which case we’ve certainly had different experiences as I’m a west-coast American. My argument around N-95 versus cloth was that it was clear from day 1 to any reasonable person that N-95 offers better protection than cloth masks. We had two years of business and school closures, several stimulus packages etc. and it wasn’t until literally last week that the government put forward a plan to distribute N-95 masks at pharmacies at no cost. That should have been standard operating procedure from day 1, but not. Culture was too focused on the performative act of masking over actually using effectual masks. And you mention “how waves start” and how that motivates how decisive action is taken. It was clear over a year ago that this virus was incredibly seasonal, with outbreaks aligning with when “inside time” happens (winter in the North of the USA, Summer in the South). It was clear over a year ago that this virus is entirely spread via aerosols, and is very unlikely to spread outside. Yet we were closing beaches and chastising unmasked people outside. And while we should all wash our hands, doing so doesn’t really impact an aerosolized respiratory virus. So if public health experts have been so prudently adjusting advice based on constantly evolving data, why were we all so married to the NPIs that we decided on in March 2020? It seems everyone picked their “side” then and refused to cede an inch to the other “side”, which is abhorrent behavior all around. Of course vaccines have reduced death and hospitalization. As of right now, 74% of adult Americans are fully vaccinated. That means 74% of adults have very strong protection against severe illness. 88% of 65+ adults are protected via two doses. A year ago this would have been considered a miracle. On top of that we have an antiviral that reduces severe disease risk greatly even and especially among high risk. Any of these miracles, (vaccines, treatments) on 2020 would have been enough to avoid lockdowns (and maybe even masks) but now in 2022, we get the constant drumbeat of “well it’s not _quite_ safe enough yet”. That is why I say the goal posts have moved. Almost anyone in the USA who wants protection can get it _for free_ and we still aren’t living life anywhere near “normally”. That is absurd. [1] https://www.wellandgood.com/misuse-gaslighting/amp/ https://www.wellandgood.com/misuse-gaslighting/amp/
bad_username 5y ago