3 ms·
Well yes , harm is the point. It is not up to the slave to be the bearer of good in the face of evil.
by Jcowell 5y ago
Well yes , harm is the point. It is not up to the slave to be the bearer of good in the face of evil.
- tablespoon 5y ago> Well yes , harm is the point. It is not up to the slave to be the bearer of good in the face of evil. Slave? Good? Evil? The rhetoric in this thread is over the top and way too melodramatic. "Valiant nurse Skywalker struck a blow against the EVIL Empire by letting the sick ewok Wicket wallow in his own shit. He could help Wicket, but that would be SLAVERY, so he BECAME THE BEARER OF GOOD by watching Wicket suffer and reading a magazine instead of helping him." Let me put it this way: It's more evil to sit there and watch some patient suffer without helping them than whatever evil you're so concerned with here. However, I totally get that it may be difficult for some software engineers (whose jobs typically have no more moral significance or responsibility than a GameStop clerk's), to understand that not every situation is like their own.