3 ms·
> ML enforcing rules is bad enough, not allowing false positives to be corrected is ridiculous. And potentially illegal. According to Article 22 of the GDPR:
by dane-pgp 5y ago
> ML enforcing rules is bad enough, not allowing false positives to be corrected is ridiculous.
And potentially illegal. According to Article 22 of the GDPR:
"The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her."
I think that being accused of copyright infringement (and having your free speech rights curtailed) should count as "similarly significant" to a legal effect on someone.
- bryanrasmussen 5y agoFree speech does not exist in the same way in the EU, where the GDPR exists, as it does in the U.S on edit: clarification as I seem to have offended some people, there is no right to free speech in Europe similar to the right in the U.S Bill of Rights, the closest is the following https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/11-freedom-expression-and-information https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/11-freedom-expre... hope this clarifies it for people. on edit 2: here you can get a country by country overview https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country#European_Union https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_by_country#E...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]