3 ms·

> Plenty of its advocates very clearly WANT to force people to partake though Advocates evangelize heavily, sure, but will you provide some examples of this? I

• paulgb 5y ago
  I mean, it's in the name itself - web3 makes it sound like it's the next evolution of the web that we'll all be using in a few years. I think that's part of why there's so much backlash from the tech community -- it feels like a small group of people (who largely haven't built much on the web besides React apps) have decided that they get to call what they're working on the new web, even though it's currently mostly vaporware and bad art.
  • haswell 5y ago
    There’s a pretty big difference between “this project is named poorly and isn’t ready for prime time” and “advocates want to force people to use it”. Don’t get me wrong - I share plenty of the same concerns others have shared throughout this thread, and tend to think “web3” is not a good thing to call this, but don’t see the “by force” claim as valid at this point. Plenty of apps/projects brand themselves as the next coming/generation/evolution/whatever. Only adoption will tell us if they’re right.
    • paulgb 5y ago
      Fair, but I think the name is reflective of a greater attitude. I've never been told I'm NGMI (“not going to make it”) for not adopting Serverless, or that I should “have fun staying poor” if I ignore Kubernetes.
      • jakelazaroff 5y ago
        Multiple web3 people have told me to "have fun staying poor" for being skeptical about what they're offering, which kinda gives away the whole game.