> Well you proved you don’t know the market at all and you’re willing to just make stuff up I know how the real world works. So no need to make stuff up. > An

> Well you proved you don’t know the market at all and you’re willing to just make stuff up I know how the real world works. So no need to make stuff up. > Anyone can make an NFT and they can attach any IP rights they want to the NFT, it can be a copyright assignment, it can be a license or it can be none. The market utilizes all the above. That's not how copyright works. To quote U.S. Copyright Office, "Mere ownership of a copy or phonorecord that embodies a work does not give the owner of that copy or phonorecord the ownership of the copyright in the work." Besides, with NFT you don't even own a "copy or a phonorecord". > There are underlying legal contracts that are enforceable in court that license the copyrighted work to the owners. If there's an underlying legal contract, then that contract governs the license/copyright transfer, and not the NFT. NFT literally mean zero. Nothing about them is legally binding or enforceable. They are the definition of made up. > For fuck sake owners of Apes have used their commercial license 1. Commercial license is not copyright 2. For a commercial license you literally have no need for NFTs