3 ms·
That's not really it. The funny business in Amazon's pricing is their Egress Bandwidth, everything is rational. You're looking at the pricing from a 'cost plu
by jollybean 5y ago
That's not really it.
The funny business in Amazon's pricing is their Egress Bandwidth, everything is rational.
You're looking at the pricing from a 'cost plus' perspective which is not generally how things are priced.
AWS core use case is IT departments being able to offload all of their infra.
It's a massive, massive advantage. It's so, so much easier and more flexible to use AWS that there is no comparison. It's a 'no brainer' from a cost perspective, which is why, cost usually isn't a barrier with AWS.
Cost only becomes a primary issue when the margin of AWS services is reflected in the cost of the product itself, i.e. when you are hosting a lot of content.
So if you are Phizer, and your IT department uses AWS, the cost is irrelevant.
If you are Dropbox, selling storage for $X/Gigabyte, and your competitors are reducing their prices and you're giving all of your margin to AWS, then you have to do something, i.e. 'make your own infra'.
- pdimitar 5y agoI mean OK but I've been in big corps and they end up hiring a ton of DevOps that basically specialize in AWS. Is that still cheaper? When you have 30+ very well-paid dedicated DevOps specialists? Maybe it is, I am just skeptical while looking at it as an outsider and without solid data.