4 ms·
"Btrfs is great in its intentions but still not as stable as it should be after all these years of development." may have been true years ago, but doesn't seem
by TurningCanadian 5y ago
"Btrfs is great in its intentions but still not as stable as it should be after all these years of development." may have been true years ago, but doesn't seem to be anymore.
- csdvrx 5y agoGive it another 10 years, and we may get a stable alternative to ZFS that will live in the kernel tree.
- dralley 5y agoAnd maybe it will be bcachefs :)
- traceroute66 5y agoHow's the old RAID56 problem in BTRFS coming on ? ;-)
- TurningCanadian 5y agoPick any given feature and a FS may or not support it well. RAID56 did have a major update, but still has the write hole and isn't recommended for production. I think the point still stands though. There has been lots of stabilization work done to BTRFS, and anyone using production-recommended features should consider the filesystem stable.