3 ms·
> That is not to take anything away from his achievements The entire purpose of mentioning his privilege at all is to take away from his achievements. Otherwis
by jeegsy 5y ago
> That is not to take anything away from his achievements
The entire purpose of mentioning his privilege at all is to take away from his achievements. Otherwise, why mention it. Surely it is obvious to all who read the article that you would have had to have access to capital to do what he did?
- JohnBooty 5y agoIf you want to believe my opinion is something other than the one I'm explicitly stating, that is a very strange decision. For the record: I'm not sure how much more clear I can be, but I do not feel that it takes away from his achievements whatsoever. I made my statement in reply to another poster who seemed to have the impression that this level of opportunity was the norm in America. That was the full extent of my "purpose."