3 ms·
I'm in the opposite camp, compensation of high dpi is nice for "main show" screen parts like the active editor in an IDE, but stuff like Winamp is just perfect
by usrusr 5y ago
I'm in the opposite camp, compensation of high dpi is nice for "main show" screen parts like the active editor in an IDE, but stuff like Winamp is just perfect in an always-on windowshade living in as few millimeters as possible of the titlebar region of the left screen (dunno why it's the left, Winamp has been the left screen for almost two decades)
On topic, where everyone mentions "their" winamp skin: for me, winamp is the pale blue of the inconsistently named trainatron/trinatron. Always on top, always minimized to shade, only expanded to toggle the playlist shade (but usually operated simply by drag&dropping album folders).
One time ordering was broken when windows stopped to supply files in alphabetic order so I had to make a plugin that took care of that (my files are certainly named with padded index prefix). That plugin might have been the most wonky piece of c++ routinely ruining on my system, but it did the job for quite some years.