3 ms·
It's on par with other latency optimized GCs for pure pause time but because it's architecture pays a gigantic throughput cost making it only a mediocre GC over
by jpgvm 5y ago
It's on par with other latency optimized GCs for pure pause time but because it's architecture pays a gigantic throughput cost making it only a mediocre GC overall. ZGC puts out the same pause numbers with monstrous throughput in comparison.