3 ms·
I currently use bookdown and have dabbled with Jupyterbook. Why should I use this instead? I don't see any advantages, esp. for scientific and technical books /
by acenes 5y ago
I currently use bookdown and have dabbled with Jupyterbook. Why should I use this instead? I don't see any advantages, esp. for scientific and technical books / websites.
- ncmncm 5y agoSee https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30049672 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30049672 So, it is the next generation of that.
- acenes 5y agoSo, why should one use the next generation? Because it is not tied to R or Python? We're all using one or the other so that doesn't sound like a convincing reason to completely change my workflow.
- jjallr 5y agoI think if you are happy with the workflow/output you have there is no reason at all to change. w/r/t to websites and books we have put a lot of investment into features for both (https://quarto.org/docs/websites/ https://quarto.org/docs/websites/, https://quarto.org/docs/books/ https://quarto.org/docs/books/). If you compare books with Bookdown vs. Quarto vs. JupyterBook I think you'll find that each does some things better than the others (so again if you are happy w/ your existing tools no reason to change).
- acenes 5y agoThanks for the response. Is there any plan for Quarto to support live code, e.g. the reader can change the code and update the output? Or a feature that makes it easy to have a comment section for each page? I think these things are either not supported or not trivial to do with Bookdown or JupyterBook.