3 ms·
Yes it's interesting, precisely because it's intuitively "solvable" by machines. There's joy in solving by hand, and joy in creating a solver, but probably no
by ycombobreaker 5y ago
Yes it's interesting, precisely because it's intuitively "solvable" by machines. There's joy in solving by hand, and joy in creating a solver, but probably no joy in running your solver every day and sharing with your friends. Because every decision is some maximum-likelihood estimate, there's no tension or drama in the sequence of guesses.
In fact, simply the act of creating an infallible solver (100% likelihood of 6 guesses or less) demonstrates the futility of competing with their soft, fleshy skills.
I do think any solver that uses the solution-set is "cheating", but I suspect it makes little difference in the total solution (like... 2-3 bits of additional information needed, just a fraction of a round).
- eru 5y agoYou might find some enjoyment in writing solvers that compete with your friends' solvers? You could either compete on number of guesses. Or you could fix the hardware (eg a Famicom), and compete on runtime?