3 ms·
Of course! But software engineering in the large -- which is the domain that Go targets -- is ultimately not a technical domain, but a social one; the programme
by preseinger 5y ago
Of course! But software engineering in the large -- which is the domain that Go targets -- is ultimately not a technical domain, but a social one; the programmers who maintain the project are the ultimate authority. That's fine!
- super_flanker 5y agoDidn't you just claim: > Go asserts that "error handling" and "main flow" (a.k.a. "happy path") code paths are equivalent, and that you can't ignore the bad stuff as you program against the good stuff. But it seems the go relies on a good code reviewer for error handling.
- preseinger 5y ago> Go asserts that "error handling" and "main flow" (a.k.a. "happy path") code paths are equivalent, Yes... > and that you can't ignore the bad stuff as you program against the good stuff. No? I don't claim that -- at least in the sense that the compiler permits you to ignore errors if you want to. But that's not some death blow against the language. The compiler is one of many mechanisms that can be used to assert code quality.