4 ms·
> It's garbage collector is mediocre for latency, nothing impressive. Go's GC is best-in-class for latency. What makes you think otherwise?
by preseinger 5y ago
> It's garbage collector is mediocre for latency, nothing impressive.
Go's GC is best-in-class for latency. What makes you think otherwise?
- jpgvm 5y agoIt's on par with other latency optimized GCs for pure pause time but because it's architecture pays a gigantic throughput cost making it only a mediocre GC overall. ZGC puts out the same pause numbers with monstrous throughput in comparison.