> > This leads to a stunning possibility implied by the opening quote. True expert intuition may often be associated with poor explanations. We should therefore

> > This leads to a stunning possibility implied by the opening quote. True expert intuition may often be associated with poor explanations. We should therefore be extremely suspicious of neat explanations in the broadest domains. > Does anyone think this is actually a valid or plausible argument for its conclusion? Not particularly. Most critically, it is in itself a neat explanation.