I like it, but I would describe it as an encoding more than a font. I also think it's 1x5, not 1x8. In that case, it would be more than twice as efficient as th

I like it, but I would describe it as an encoding more than a font. I also think it's 1x5, not 1x8. In that case, it would be more than twice as efficient as the 4x3. In a way, it's a restricted ascii subset.