4 ms·
So I learned the history of the blue check came from Tony LaRussa's account being spoofed and he sued them and then they created the verified blue check concept
by jimkleiber 5y ago
So I learned the history of the blue check came from Tony LaRussa's account being spoofed and he sued them and then they created the verified blue check concept. I think it may be one of the strongest legal arguments for them to do it. And also an easy way for them to combat bots without having to admit all the fake accounts on their platform.
I wrote a whole essay on it during a hackathon in SF: https://medium.com/hackmentalhealth/why-twitter-should-verify-more-users-towards-a-more-human-web-9b7975aac414 https://medium.com/hackmentalhealth/why-twitter-should-verif...
- ghaff 5y agoCertainly spoofing and other forms of impersonation are the reason. But saying that only relatively famous people deserve proactive protection doesn't strike me as a great look. Yes, well-known people are more likely to be targeted and the effects are likely to be greater but I'm not sure that's a justification for withholding verification from everyone else.
- jimkleiber 5y agoThe effects are also more likely to be noticeable if impersonating someone famous, whereas easier to skate by if the person is not famous so I agree that they should enable it for all. I don't get it either why they're holding back. I'm at some point where I want someone to make a twitter like platform with mostly if not exclusively verified people, I hope twitter does it but I doubt it, so I hope someone else will. I can get really tired of interacting with people wearing masks or people wearing masks of other people's faces.