3 ms·

> … not really like for like… Except when it is: this C# program seems to have been transliterated from the Java program — mandelbrot C# .NET #5 https://benc

• CraigJPerry 5y ago
  That highlights my point pretty well - you've chosen one of the c# impls that doesn't use anything more than a few compiler hints but it's slower than the java solution. However if you look at the overall results, c# is about 25% faster on mandlebrot, and when you peek under the covers - https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/program/mandelbrot-csharpcore-1.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/... - you find it's using AVX vector instructions. Not like for like in the summary view which is why i think those results are misleading.
  • igouy 5y ago
    > … slower than the java solution. !! 4.10s Java #2 4.11s C# .NET #5 ---- > … overall results, c# is about 25% faster on mandlebrot… You say "overall results" but the webpage says — "Always look at the source code. These are only the fastest programs."